For Pope Leo, LG 16 is invisible. So he has aligned himself with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as held by Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior, at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA.
Also for Archbishop Rino Fisichella and Paulo Ruffini at the Vatican, Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance refers to an invisible and hypothetical case.
Pope Leo is doctrinally in agreement with the religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center, in New Hampshire. He is indirectly affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, when he interprets and accepts Vatican Council II, rationally, like Brother Andre Marie micm.
At the St.Benedict Center they have reconciled Vatican Council II with Traditional EENS, unlike the SSPX. For the SSPX, EENS has explicit exceptions.
The St.Benedict Center has also aligned the Catechism of the Catholic Church with all the old Catechisms, unlike the SSPX. For the SSPX 29Q in the Catechism of Pope Pius X, contradicts, 24Q and 27 Q, but not for the SBC.
Now the Ecclesia Dei communities, the Franciscans of the Immaculate( both groups) and the SSPX, can align Vatican Council II like Tradition, as does Brother Andre Marie micm, when LG 16 refers to only a hypothetical case.
We finally have doctrinal unity in the Church, the traditionalist-liberal division is finished since the Council and Catechism interpreted rationally, is no more liberal. It is aligned with the traditionalists. So there is no break with the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century. Salvation theology is once again apostolic and magisterial for the Ecclesia Dei communities and the traditionalists.
Brother Andre Marie interprets Vatican Council II and all Magisterial Documents rationally.Pope Leo is the pope for him. The pope also affirms Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. The community, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, seek canonical recognition.
They can give an an account of their Catholic faith in public unlike many religious communities, which interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and then go into sedevacantism or are liberal and schismatic, rejecting Tradition.
There is the sedevacantist CMRI community in New Hampshire which rejects Vatican Council II irrational and affirms Cushingite Tradition. They do not affirm a Feeneyite Vatican Council II, a Feeneyie baptism of desire and a Feeneyite EENS, like the SBC in NH.
Then there is Bishop Peter Libasci , the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire, who also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so schismatically. He rejections Feeneyite Tradition. This is a break with the Church Fathers and the Apostles.
Cardinals Cupich, Nichols and Roche must adapt and accept LG 16 etc invisible and hypothetical, otherwise they will continue to be in public schism.- Lionel Andrades