First thoughts which come to mind: 1) Thanks Donald: Father of the clotshot, which he still pimps, but will not take himself. 2) These numbers will be artificially low, since they don’t include those who haven’t reported adverse effects, and neither do they count those who died from the abortion vax, who can’t report that they are dead. 3) The SSPX says the abortion vax is morally licit. Supposing for the sake of argument that their position regarding remote material cooperation in evil could be sustained in itself (is it really only remote and material?), and that the conditions enumerated in Rome’s Dignitas Personae for the use of such “vaccines” were present (even though they clearly are not), how could the abortion clotshot be considered morally licit in light of the prevalence of such a high number of maiming and deaths? Can someone explain to me why drag racing and skydiving are considered grave matter, because of the risk of injury or death, but the experimental gene serum is not?